TRANSCRIPT OF THE ERRORS IN TIME TAPE

TRANSCRIPT OF THE ERRORS IN TIME TAPE

Сообщение Timecops » 26 дек 2015, 09:57

Web auditing in any place on the planet http://webauditing.org/

TRANSCRIPT OF THE ERRORS IN TIME TAPE


St. Hill Special Briefing Course Tape lecture of 18 July 63



6307C18 SHSBC-287 renumbered SHSBC-316


Well, glad to see you all here, dry. Summer - summer's gone now, you
know? I find out when summer is gone by watching the banyan tree. It's
on the other side of the house there. And when its leaves start to turn
brown, why, we know autumn is amongst us. So break out your boots and
dogsleds. (laughter).

This is what?

Audience: Eighteen July.

Eighteen July AD 13, Saint Hill Special Briefing Course, and another
lecture on dating.

Now, I've already told you--I've already told you that dating is a
very high-caliber activity, very important in auditing, and that the
tone arm sticks only because of wrong dates. Got That? That's realy the
reason tone arms stick. Frankly, it's the only reason tone arms stick.

And you might have asked yourself, some time or another, "If you do
have this much track, why does everybody around believe so implicitly
that they have lived only once?" See, it might seem rather odd to you
that the insistance on this fact that people have lived only once, the
near-psychotic frenzy with which people go into, insisting they have
lived only once. It must really take something to shut off somebody's
memory to that degree. It really must take something. Actually a GPM
doesn't account for it. The goal "To Be dead" in the GPMs is not enough.
Because that doesn't say you've lived only once, that just tells you to
be dead.

So you might ask yourself, why is it that man is so wrong-dated?
Now, when I was able to run down the common denominator of people who
can't run on the time track, I found out that the common denominator was
not whether or not they got sonic and visio, but whether or not they got
tone arm motion. Very good, we've just covered that in a lecture. And
the reason they don't get tone arm motion is wrong time - wrong dates.

All right, so much for that.

Behind all aberration there must be a lie. And you can mark that
down in letters of fire. Aberration cannot exist in the presence of
truth. Aberration can only exist in the presence of a lie. If somebody
is hung with lombosis, you can be very sure that there is a lie
connected with the lumbosis. Elementary, my dear Watson. That is one of
the common denominators of Scientology. That is one of the truisms, one
of the maxims, something that weaves through everything.

There are others of similar nature. For instance, don't talk to a pc
or a person, or talk around a person, who is unconscious. You know, and
it's that sort of thing. And want to know something about aberration,
that's a better contribution than anything "Wuff Wuff" Pavlov ever
dreamed up. Didn't you know that was his name? Later part of his life
you know. His papers, as far as I'm concerned, go "Bark-bark-bark-bark
comma, bark-bark-bark comma, bark-bark-bark semicolon."

Reg <Reg Sharp> was kind enough to dig me up some Pavlov. I wanted
some Pavlov. I was studying how not to write up technical data. I didn't
know that was why I wanted Pavlov, I just knew it must be important to
do some study on this, and that's what I found. I didn't find that dogs
were very informative, I know more about dogs than he does. But - I mean
just as dogs. Dogs are friends of mine, and he didn't like them. But,
"Wuff Wuff" Pavlov gives us a marvelous example of how not to write up
technical information. It's heroic, man. Try it sometime. He wanders all
over the pastures and the fields and dales, and so forth, and he finally
gets down to his something-or-other.

It's much more important to him that he used "surgery comparable to
that applied to human beings" when operating on dogs. And he goes on at
great length about the surgery precautions taken on his dogs. And he was
taking perfectly healthy, happy dogs, and cutting out half their bladder
or half their esophagus or half of something. He never could go all the
way, you know? He - And he admitted that this more or less damaged his
laboratory animals, and therefore he had to take surgical precautions.
And it isn't a textbook on surgery.

He's giving, of course, the conditions of his experiment. But he
never gets around to the experiment.

But anyway, "Wuff_ Wuff" Pavlov is a marvelous example of a lot of
things. He is a man who is totally dedicated to the dramatization of one
engram: the-Darwinian theory - Man from Mud. He's a physiologist turned
psychologist. And he's in wild protest against the psychologists.
Because remember, the psychologists of his day believed in the soul.
Some of them were still around who did. After all, psychologist means
Psyche - Ologist.

And he's the great physiologist. And you want to look at how you get
aberrated because your neurons have turned into morons.

I was there trying to ask a question. I'm not wandering afield from
what I'm talking about here, I was trying to ask, I was trying to ask a
question.

Why is it that the Russians know nothing about some of the basic
laws of social behavior? Why is it that they overlook these laws? And I
thought, they have Pavlov, and Pavlov stresses the salivation of the
dog, not his salvation, his salivation, that's all he was interested in,
the salivation of the dog when stimulated by beefsteak, and the whining
of the dog when beaten with clubs. So they would, he would mix these two
stimulus response mechanisms up, and so on.

And I wanted to know if Pavlov had ever drawn the conclusion - I
haven't found this out yet, I can't wade through the stuff - but if he'd
ever drawn the conclusion that a reward was also part of existence. That
was what I was trying to draw. Do the Russians know this? Is this part
of the Russian mental technology? And apparently it is not. And
apparently that fact reads through Pavlov without being punched up, as
near as I can tell. He doesn't say "existence consists of reward and
punishment". See? That is not the thesis.

Now, thee and me, knowing more about this, would immediately
conceive that if somebody had a dog salivating or whining under
punishment or reward that he would conclude that there were two stimuli,
and one was reward and one was punishment. But this is far too simple,
and Pavlov never made these comparisons, apparently, as far as I can
tell, wading through the stuff. Isn't that interesting?

I consider that extremely fascinating, because the whole Russian
system is caving in because they haven't got this little factor of
reward. That is what Is wrong with the Russian communist system.
Frankly, thee and me could probably sit down and figure out a communist
system that would be a geewhizzer, that would probably work. The -
probably the fault is not with communism, the fault is the lie which
lies behind communism, which is the physiological nature of man.

Now, with that lie back of communism, communism becomes a scourge.
See, it becomes an aberration. There are probably many things about
communism that aren't aberrative. You could probably do lots of things
with the idea of the communal activity of man. You could probably do a
lot of things with collectivism. We do things with collectivism. We try
to make it work. The Russians are not interested in making it work
because they've misunderstood the nature of man. And this is not a
lecture on Russia, I'm just showing you the lie back of aberration.

So communism becomes fought, and communism becomes very disastrous
when practiced. And the poor sods that are walking around with communism
wonder where their next muzhik is coming from. They don't know. And
that's because when Pavlov did his work, he never said that life
consisted of reward and punishment.

He does a total anatomy of punishment. And here's this drifting
factor, reward, which is apparently on automatic. The reason capitalism
works is because nobody has analyzed it, and people want pay and they
give them pay.

I almost started a riot amongst Bantus by telling them that if
communism came to South Africa - this was real mean of me - why, they
wouldn't, they wouldn't get paid, that communisms didn't pay you for
your work. And they thought this was terrible. And they were spitting on
the street and stamping and damning Khrushchev, see?

I mean it was very upsetting to them. Because the one thing - the
very, very commercial little culture the Bantu has ... And boy you talk
about the importance of debts! Some guy owes some money, why that debt
will be passed down, and next generation, and next generation somebody's
great great great great grandchildren are still worried abou those two
cows, you see, that Uncle Zidd, or something, is owed. They just - the
idea of commerce and money and that sort of thing is very deeply
ingrained in these people.

And to tell them that communism was a system of getting them to work
so they didn't have to be - so they wouldn't be paid, that just about
finished it.

Now, if capitalism was earnest about fighting communism, and so
forth, it would dig up a few salient truths and let them have it, see?
Because that is the lie back of communism. The lie back of communism is
man is a physiological animal going forward on the basis of a punishment
stimulus-response. And of course, man does not, DOES NOT, respond to
punishment stimulus response. Very un-uniform response.

You've had the experience yourself. You take somebody and you say,
"If you don't so-and-so and so-and-so, I'm going to rhrr-rhrr-rhrr-
rhrrr".

And A, that you told this to, cringed and said, "Oh yes! All right,
all right. Don't beat me." And B, C and D said, "Why you SOB. Knock your
block off, see?" You'd knok their heads in, and they'd get back up, and
they still wouldn't do it. And you knock their heads in, and they'd get
back up, and they still wouldn't do it. And it's not a constant, don't
you see?

In other words, not all living beings succumb to the stimulus of
promised punishment. The whole Roman Empire caved in because a sect,
called the Christians, moved in, who didn't stimuli or who didn't
"respo" when they got the stimuli of punishment. The court said, "We're
going to burn you at the stake." And they saic "Burn away! We will
become martyrs." And the Roman Empire couldn't handle them! That was it!
That was it, see, they'd met their match. Very important. Extremely
important.

Now, stimulus-response, then, is half of the picture, don't you see?
Man does not go as a total stimulus response mechanism. Down in various
homely locales I've heard "Ya kin ketch more flies with honey then ya
kin with vinegar!" You've heard that sort of thing. Well, they're
talking about the reward part of existence, see? That's very important,
the reward part of existence.

Now, the Christian had a greater reward promised him than the
punishment. In the first place, he HAD to die in order to go to heaven.
And he simply considered this very accomodating on the part of the Roman
empire and its courts. It got him there that much quicker. And so the
Roman empire could do nothing with the Christian, the Christian
overthrew the Roman Empire and it became the Holy Roman Empire.
Literally, factually, yes, you see?

Well, there was a lie. There was a lie involved, then, in the Roman
Empire. So it didn't survive. And what was that lie? Well, they must
have been subscribing to the same thing Pavlov was writing about; that
man is a stimulus-response creature who responds to punishment and
threat of punishment; and that to get something done, you threaten or
you punish; and if you threaten and punish enough, you will get things
done.

Well, I will give it to the Roman Empire, they got quite a ways.
They got further than anybody else. But there was a lie involved there,
in that there wasn't a whole statement of the proposition. There was
also reward. And the funny part of it is that men will do more things
for reward than they will for punishment. So they had just cut out three
quarters of the pie, and then said that the remaining quarter of the pie
was the totality of the pie, and tried to carry an empire along on that
basis, and of course, it folded. And what do you know! After all these
years, you think things change actually, in this very finite period of
time since the Roman Empire, and the equally religious fervor of the
communist Russian Empire, you get the same fault cropping up.

So you have the philosophy which they adopt is the one which assures
them that punishment is all. They adopt this philosophy, and they have
immediately adopted something which gives them a commercial upset,
economic upset. And although they're very clever people and have a great
deal on the ball on the subject of economics, they say economics are
nine-tenths of life; life is only one-tenth political. They've got a lot
of things like this. They have a terrific propaganda machine. They have
practically every newspaper editor in the world working for them.
Khrushchev has more press agents than any other single ruler in the
world.

And yet, in spite of all this, on one of their collective farms,
they go around and take a look at the tractor, and its wheels have
fallen off. And they want to know where's the tractor driver, and they
don't know where he is. "Well he's down in the woods". "Well, where's
the woods? What's ... Who else is in the woods?" this manager will be
saying. And "Well, he's down there, and they're picking berries." "Oh,
they're picking berries. Well, all right." And he goes down and he says
to the guys down in the woods, "What are you doing picking berries?" And
all the old women and everybody down there says, "Well, we've got to do
something to make a living!" And they found out that they can pick
berries, and put them in boxes and sell them in the local town, and they
can make a couple of quick rubles. See? To hell with the collective
farm. See?

Half-a-ruble reward for sweating it out in the woods picking berries
is much better than a no-ruble reward because they're going to get their
heads blown off if they don't drive the tractors and plow the fields,
see? You get the idea?

So they're running into this all the time. This causes them then to
go into a terrific campaign of some kind or another, you know. They go
into this terrific campaign, "What you want to be is the "new man", "the
total communist", the this, the that, the... Those guys are just
sweating themselves to pieces all the time. And they're trying to
compensate for this lie.

They think capitalism produces, in some peculiar and mysterious way,
more goods than a communism. And they don't know why this is. They've
never analyzed why this is because Pavlov didn't tell them. Capitalism
has many, many things wrong with it. But it hasn't clipped off totally,
not until they invented internal revenue, anyway, the totality of award.
So you can still, you can still, if you're very, very clever and so on,
you can still keep some of your pay, if you're careful. But it's still a
reward system.

Now as that reward system dwindles, so dwindles the actual health of
the society. And the more internal revenue and the less reward, and the
more threat of punishment, and the more you can go to jail if you don't
turn over all your pounds, shillings, dollars, francs or something, to
the local income tax people, you see, the more that works, why, the more
difficulty their society gets into. See, you're not spending any time to
work out how to, how do you go about making a healthy economic society?
They never spend any time on that. They're just chipping away at this
award and punishment. So actually they're starting to borrow Pavlov too.

So, here is a lie. Here is a lie. The statement that man acts
totally because of punishment and only because of punishment; that man
is a driven animal. That lie, all by itself, is destroying the social
structure of man. Because man doesn't go like that! You see? But we
enter this lie upon the stage, and here we go. All you've got to do is
have a great big lie floating around someplace and you have trouble.

Now, it is perfectly all right to have difficulty isolating the
truth, as long as you are continuing to try to isolate the truth. That's
the difference. You sit down hard on one lie, and say that now is the
truth, and you've done the trick, you see? You say, "Pavlov has written
all there is to know about the human mind", and at that moment you've
had it. Because he hasn't. He hasn't even written about the human mind.
And the reason I mentioned his prose is because it's obvious why nobody
has ever read him, you can't.

So a sort of a tradition has grown up as to what Pavlov's work is
all about. See? And we have not even the work of Pavlov motivating this
kind of thing. We've got a superstition about what the work of Pavlov is
about. It's never been properly presented, you see?

We've got a lot of lies around, and so forth, but we're not betting
on those lies to carry us through, see? That's perfectly all right. You
can have a whole bunch of misconceptions and still not do your nut. But
the second you settle completely on a lie, and say now that that is the
truth, from that moment on you've had it. And you've had it to the
degree that that truth can be pervasive in your life. You can say, "Joe
is a good man" when you know - when really the truth is he's a bad man,
and this may cause you some inconvenience, but it won't destroy your
sanity. It'll cause you some worry. But you say, "I have lived but
once", and then believe it, defend it and contest it, and of course,
you're going to have trouble from there on out. It takes a lie of this
magnitude to continue the aberration of man. It takes a magnitudinous
one.

Now, to maintain such a lie must at the same time take a fantastic
amount of duress. I mean you'd have to work at it to maintain that lie.
And whenever you find a maintained lie, you'll find somebody is working
at it. This guy has got a headache... Well, I don't know that you could
do an all-therapy on this basis. This guy has got a headache. You find
the lie connected with the headache, and you could probably resolve the
headache. That very well might be an open sesame to all psychosomatic
healing. You know, you could probably work a whole parade of stuff out:
"Let's find the lie connected with..." See? "Recall a lie about a
headache," see? Something like that. And bang, the guy's headache is
gone. You see, you're working now with one of these first principles,
when you're working with a lie. You got that?

Now let's carry this just a little bit further... I didn't mean to
get off into_communism. I thought you might be amused. Now carrying this
off a little further, let's find a lie about WHAT. See, now that we've
found out a lie is this pervasive, see, now, what would be the most
disastrous type of lie? And the most disastrous type of lie as a common
denominator, although there are many disastrous types of lies, would be
about time.

So let's combine these two things, you see? You see what a lie can
do, all by itself, that has nothing to do with time. All right, now
let's combine it with something which has the power to freeze a tone arm
on a pc, that no matter... a big mid ruds on what bad things you've done
to him in the session, no matter what horrible this-a's'and that-a's and
what processes you were to run - without paying any attention to lies or
time, you see - no matter what you do to correct this tone arm, if you
do not pay attention to wrong time it will not correct. You got that?
See? This is the only one capable of putting a total freeze on a tone
arm.

Well a total freeze on a tone arm is a total freeze on a case. So
this gets fantastic. This gets very, very, very, very dreary indeed. So
we must be looking here at something like a pervasive common denominator
of abberation when we say "a lie about time".

This immediately brings to view processes by the ton. You start
thinking up processes, you can just string them out by the hour. "Recall
a lie about time", you see. "Recall a lie about time, Recall a lie about
time" see? This kind of a - this kind of a process would just string on
and on and on and on and on, don't you see?

Now, it's interesting that if you - if you - oh, you can think of
others. You can think of others. Let's just date everything in
somebody's life. That's an ordinary one. He believes he's lived but
once, well, let's date everything in that life that has lived but once.
Soon as we got that thing kind of dated up you're liable to find out
that he'll fall through.

Now, just think of, think of this approach, see? You might even
apply this on an institutional level to just get the whenness of things,
you know? For instance when is this E-Meter? Guy would have to think for
a long time. He'd finally decide it was now, see? Might be quite
deaberrative; might straighten out his time track most interestingly. Of
course, that's highly experimental, not advanced as something that is
proven. But I'm just giving you an idea that you can extrapolate this
idea of lie about time almost anyplace you want to look, and you will
have some interesting results on a processing line.

See, because that combines then the single action that is the most
aberrative action, which is an alter-isness of truth or a denial of
truth, with the one thing which if aberrated brings about, then, the
greatest mess-up from the viewpoint of a person. We won't call it
anything technical, but it just messes him up most. Time messes him up
the most. And we get these two things in combination, of course, we get
a lie about time, and we're off to the races.

Well, having recognized this situation, I looked it over very
carefully. We have the GPMs, and we have things of this nature, and
looked those over, and then I said to myself, I said, "Well now," I
said, "Ronnie, if you've gotten this far, this sort of thing, let's just
take a look at this now. You suppose some peculiarly and particularly
brilliant blankety-blank somewhere on the track has also discovered this
and used it to aberrate? Ah well, if that's the case, then there must be
such a thing as false time track, complete with times. Let's see if we
can find some." And I found some.

Give somebody a false past. Implant him with a false past, complete
with pictures, complete with times, and times in the order of magnitude
of the thetan's actual existence - trillions and trillions of years. We
could also give him some weird and incomprehensible dates. That'd be a
little fillip on the thing, you know; that would be some way tn throw a
new curve into it. Give him one thousand and sixty-nine times trillion
to the tenth. Let him chew on that for a while. And he never can find
out what date that is.

And you would effectually have blocked out the past by making it so
confusing to be entered, and so dreary and so terrible and so awful that
nobody would want to have anything to do with it. Now, nobody ever would
spend any time enhancing the powers of the thetan, unless he was more
diabolical than is believable. But they'd certainly tend to make them
derogatory. They'd make the life as a thetan seem very, very dangerous,
very unpleasant. Because look! Look at the horrible thing's that can
happen to you. And therefore, if all these horrible things can happen to
you, why, then of course, you don't want to have anything to do with it.

And you could get a guy fixed up with sufficient number of false
pasts, that he'd even dramatize a false past. He'd become a fiction
writer or something like that. He'd even, he'd even automatically give
you a false story of his past, don't you see? He could get quite loopy
on this subject, if he were driven in with enough explosion, enough
bang, and so on. And if the incident itself were hung up with a double
explosion, you know, left-right bang-bang, sort of a double RI <GPM
Reliabile Item> of the thing, you see? Plus and minus RI of the thing;
hang it up on the track real good.

And just give him a good, long time track. Let's give him, let's
give him a few trillion years to chew on, or a few trillion trillion
years to chew on. And let's give him some incident on that track. Let's
give him a nice history that goes along with that track. Let's give him
pictures. Let's even give him some times when he's been implanted.

Of course, we couldn't give him much of an implant, but we could
give him a clue that he might have been implanted at this point. You
know, let a couple of the pictures leak out, looks like they're implant
pictures. That'd sort of keep him tacking that point of the line,
wouldn't it?

And by giving him ennugh false track, and maybe giving him four or
five or six false tracks, he would rapidly get of the opinion that the
one thing he shouldn't do is to return on the time track. Because if he
does it is far too painful and confusing.

And you'd have him saying at last, in self-defense, "I've only lived
but once." Yes, that is one of the tricks that has been pulled. Now, you
say, "a false past". That's good terminolqgy, by the way. Find some
auditors may trip, it around on their tongue, but you can learn how to
say it. "A false past" is better than "phony pictures," or something
like that. In discussing this with a pc, you say "a false past." Well,
he understands this.

And R3R is good enough to be able to find a moment when a false past
was installed, date it and get its duration. Really takes some doing.
Now, having dated it and gotten its duration, to actually run it out.
Now the incident pretends, let us say, to be many trillions of years
long. And the actual duration of it is seldom more than three or four
hours. So you get the appearance of enormous durations, and you get the
appearance of tiny durations. You know, two or three hour duration, or
eighty billion trillion squillion, to the nth tex boonk, see, years.

You'll get two durations on the thing, some vast duration and some
little duration. And the incident can be run out. But don't get mad at
the pc if he keeps stepping in the mud, you know, and finding himself
going to the beginning of the incident, and wondering whether or not
he's saw it.

Now, these incidents have as a common denominator, these incidents
have as a common denominator, and the very few of them I have, the few I
have seen, I expect there are other kinds. I have seen some of them and
they are confused to this degree: The point where you approached and the
moment when you approached is quite commonly repeated in the incident.
So you walked up a set of steps to get there, so you now have a visio
that looks like you're wlaking up a set of steps IN the incident. Same
set of steps. So you've got two walkings up the steps. One is in the
incident, one is the actual one.

And there'll be two departures. There's the actual departure, in
which one was usually anaten and didn't know whether he was going or
coming, and the picture of his departure. And thetan-wise, of course
it'd be a picture of exteriorizing from the area; it's getting dim in
the distance.

In other words, there are two beginnings and two endings on such an
incident. Now, they also occasionally have a mechanism that shows troops
marching away and troops marching to you. This is how they communicate
the beginning and end of things. The beginning of things, of course,
troops marching to you. The end of things, troops marching away from
you. And these incidents usually start with the troops marching away
from you and end with the troops marching to you. This was the common
action. I mean, that set of pictures was therapy, at one time, and is
used consistently in therapy, so they copied this therapy device in this
other action. Only in therapy they show you the beginning of something
by, I think, the troops marching to you, and in the end, they show you
the end of thing, about the troops marching away from you.

Sometimes they're sailors. Sometimes they're sailors in pompon hats.
Sometimes they're people who look like West Point cadets. But, you'll
see these two marchings connected with it sometimes in these incidents.

So knowing these things you actually can find beginnings and ends of
it. But it's very confusing, of course, because the couple of hours
there that aren't taken up give you a whole time track. They give you
some catastrophic accident that happened to you, you see, and then you
remained dormant for a long time, and things were very mean, and so
forth.

Well, the way you can tell false track is it really doesn't move.
You've got motion to such a limited degree that it doesn't make very
much sense. Let me show you what I mean.

As you walk in this - that door back there, you see the front of
this room, don't you? When you turn around you see some more of the
room, don't you? And when you sit down, you see some more of the room in
front of you, but from a different viewpoint and level, right? And then
when you look down, you have a scanned area of passing your eyes down,
toward a book or a meter or something like that, you see? And you have
the continuous sound channel that goes all the way along that
accompanies this, any sound in the room is continuous. Well, that is a
proper sequence, very proper sequence.

Well, false track never looks like that. They've not got the time
for it, don't you see? They're crowding all this thing. So you get a
picture, if the picture is in motion, and they can be, you get a picture
of the front door, then you get a picture of the front of the room, then
you get a picture of the book in front of you, see? And they seldom add
the sound that goes with it. Many a pc who doesn't think he has any
sonic is simply running false-track incidents where there is none.
Diabolical, isn't it? Makes you go wog just to think about it.

Now, coupled with this is the fact that there is actual track. You
have actual track. And this track, of course, is more sequitur, but
again can be in segmental pictures if there's points of anaten. You'll
get the pictures right up to the point where you knocked yourself out,
see? And then you'll pick up pictures after this point. You don't have a
complete series of pictures, but they don't go chop, chop, chop. Let me
give you a, let me give you an actual one.

Thetan is lying on the ground. Airplane comes overhead. Thetan sees
airplane come overhead. It just sort of moves into view. Airplane falls
apart. We stand up and take a look. But that's simply a picture of the
parts of the airplane falling, you see? And then airplane parts are all
over the ground, only they're plastic parts. It's not a wrecked
airplane, see? We just get jump-jump-jump-jump. See? It's something like
the movie director would cut when he was making a documentary. You know,
typical modern documentary. Children starving in Armenia. Children
starving in Egypt. Children starving in Washington. Children starving.
See? You know, cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-cut. This is typical of one of these
false incidents.

Now, why does the thetan look at the false incident? Why is he more
likely to be on false incident than he is on true incident? Well, false
incident is safe. There's no bite to the stuff. There's a hell of a
bang. Now, don't think it isn't aberrative to get one of these bangs, at
the beginnings and ends and the somatics that went with it. But once
you've got those somatics under control, it's much easier to look at
false track than it is - just like you'd rather - a lot of people would
rather look at a movie of life than live, see? See, it's safe, because
one really never lived it.

They're usually a derogatory or unhappy state of affairs of some
kind or another. And they're often quite - they're not well plotted.
There isn't anything very good about it. It's messy. But in running the
incident out, of course the false track is part of the incident you're
running out, right? So the pc in running these two and a half hours gets
the sensation of running several million trillion years of track, very
often, except it doesn't take that long to do it.

Only he would gasp, if he thought he was having to scan through many
trillions of years of track. This would just fill him with "Uhhhhh Oh,
no!" you see? The time factor is too great. When he really thinks of the
number of pictures there could be on just one trillion years of track,
you see? He'll say, "Well, am I going to be here the rest of the night?"
You know? This is the idea he gets in session. Well, the longest it
could take if it were one for one would be a couple of hours.

Anyway, the somatics being wrong, and the scenery being wrong, and
the character of the scenery being wrong, the whole thing is therefore a
lie. This is a lie about time. It tells him where he has been, when.
When he wasn't there. It puts trillions of years into two hours. There
couldn't be a fancier lie about time.

Now they very often have wheels running over to the side with
numbers on them. So you can get all the dates you want on the side of
the picture. Sound familiar? But a thetan also can do this. He also can
visualize numbers to give himself "years ago" and that sort of thing.

Now, the one thing you can be absolutely sure of - one thing you can
be absolutely sure of, with false - with - on a question of false track
and dates on false track, and that sort of thing, is that there are no
GPMs that I know of. There might be signs of them implanted on the false
track, but no actual, runnable GPM could possibly be on a false-track
implant basis. That would just be totally pointless.

In the first place, you can't, on a false-track gag, get a guy to go
over the top of the Ferris wheel several times with the full kinesthesia
and motion, don't you see, and have him struck from both sides with all
kinds of firings and that sort of thing. So you know, you know that if
you're running a GPM, that you're not on false track. Otherwise, beware.

Now, it would be adventurous to say that you know you are not on
false track if vou are runninp this lifetime. I'm afraid that'd be an
adventurous statement, however, because I've seen some false track with
brownstone houses on it that I could never account for in this lifetime.

Now, many a pc, many a pc starts to recover his sanity by just
getting him to run, entering the room. See, he can verify that that is
the picture. He walks in the room and sits down in the chair, and then
you have him close his eyes, and he walk - he runs the incident of
walking in the room and going and sitting down in the chair. Now he
knows that's his picture, and he knows that is present time, and he
knows it isn't an implant; makes him feel pretty comfortable. Kind of a
weird, a weird operation. But don't discount it as its value in this
sort of thing. Because of course, a total swamp of a memory is the
target of this, and a desire not to go back into the past, these are the
immediate fruits of it.

Now, let's look at actual track. What about actual track? Can you
also find actual track? Oh yeah, that's pretty easy to find. It's pretty
easy to find. GPMs are very easy to find. The dates of GPMs, this sort
of thing. That's all perfectly accurate, don't you see? But you're
always walking there with the possibility that you've got some false
track may turn up on this pc. So there's two things you want to know
when you're - when you find an incident and date it. Two things you
really want to know is one, does it contain opposite firing items? Like
- that is to say, is it a GPM? And the other thing you want to know
about it, does it contain false track?

Not, does it contain any pictures? This very often will not
register. When I say, "false track" I'm using a term that we would use
but not necessarily on a pc. Better to say, "false past" Does it contain
any flse past? Because all these picture implants have the ambition of
teaching somebody a false past.

Now, you need all this data. You need all this data, as discouraging
and as upsetting and as miserable and as disheartening as it is. And I
know you will go home tonight and lie down and say, "God, that's
terrible. Oooh! Aaaah! Are my pictures real? Am I really real?" Remember
the old lady that the robbers caught, and cut her clothes up, and when
she finally got home her dog barked at her, and nobody knew her, and she
finally decided when she sat down, "Can this really be me?" you know?
She herself didn't know her after a while.

Well, there's no particular reason to get in that state, and it's
perfectly all right if you do, because it's simply a restimulated state.
And the cure of the state is, when dating, just make sure that you don't
have any GPMs in it, or if you do, maybe you're looking for GPMs.

That's - none of the - neither of these things debar you from
running the engram. But let's just make sure we know what we're running.
You scan somebody through a GPM, and you're going to go blang-bang-bang,
and he's going to stir it all up, but he can't see the pictures, and you
don't know what's going on. It's much easier to just - not move him to
the beginning of the incident but move him to the first pair of items.
And you don't move anybody anyhow. You just say, "Give me the first pair
of items in that GPM," see, after you've - if you want to establish what
it is, you haven't got a pattern, it's off-date, and that sort of thing,
just what are the first pair of items? He'll give you something. Work it
out. Muddle through.

When you've got it all straight, why you can scan him through the
whole incident. It's perfectly all right if you do that, also. But on
false track, what it tells you is be very very alert to getting a wrong
date for the incident, and a wrong duration. Because any incident which
contains false track is of very short duration.

How long does it take to give somebody a feature length picture in 3-
D with complete somatics hitting him in the breadbasket, of several
trillion years? If you only give him a few pictures of each? See?
Doesn't take very long. Well, that's the criteria.

Now the Darwinian theory - now, I'll give you some idea of the
influence of false track upon this society. The Darwinian theory, which
probably influenced Pavlov to the greatest degree, is just an implant.
That is an implant from man to mud. And it starts out oddly enough with
the goal, "to persist."

Starts with the goal "to persist," which I consider very, very
interesting, because there's not another item in it. There isn't even,
"not persist." There, you see, they didn't have the word, you know? They
didn't have a doublefiring item.

And then they show you your arrival, which you... See, actually they
have you in a cell for a while, so they show you being in the cell, and
then show you arriving in the room to be implanted. Got that? So you've
actually - if you were conscious when you went in the room, it - you've
got now two arrivals in the same room, see? And then they show you -
complete with pictures, not unlike a modern motion-picture screen, they
show you all that has happened to you, very briefly; they give you
background on how mean you are, and then they show you getting
implanted.

And actually the implantation takes place - the picture never
touches the pc, I mean, never touches the person being implanted, but
simply stacks mass around his body. All the time he's looking at the
picture he's having hell knocked out of him many feet away from the
picture by electronic mass stacking around his body. See, he's being hit
with waves around his body, you see? So he - this mass gets associated
with the - you know, it holds it in the picture, and so forth. And there
isn't another thing said. There's not one word said.

And one of the things you've got to be careful of in running false
past is getting the pc all mixed up with giving you a fantastic number
of items, or something like this. You understand? But in this particular
Darwinian one, nothing is said. You occasionally do get something said
in one of these things; you do sometimes get sonic in these false past
lives, or you get conversation or you get this, or you get that.

But beware, beware of running things in incidents which aren't
there. It's almost more deadly than missing things which are there.
Don't overrun these incidents. You know, you can take a GPM and you
could just pull conversation out of it by the hour. Did you know that?
And every item is wrong.

Did you realize that? The guy is sitting there in the middle of the
GPM and you don't know what the goal is, and you don't even know that
it's this type of GPM - you might have landed by accident in the middle
of the Helatrobus Implants, or somethinp_of the sort. Maybe the goal is
"to leave." And he just gives you item after item of goodbye, farewell,
adios, you know? And you know, he just gives you item after item of
goodbyes and farewells--it's just the goal "to leave."

It's just "leave," "nix leave," "absolutably," see, "left," "not
left" or "nix left," "absolutably." You know? He's giving you wrong
items. And you'll pay the penalty for getting wrong items sooner or
later - the whole incident tends to fold up. If you want to see an
incident get crunchy, get a wrong date, a wrong duration, or run things
out of it that aren't in it. So this is a point that you have to watch.

Now, this incident - this incident, now with a wheel dating device
which gives you a series of numbers that gives you - gives you the time
of these events, shows you being implanted, shows you finished
implanting, shows you leaving - being pushed out of the implant room,
even shows you a couple of your fellow crew members, or something like
that, there, who are tied up ready to be put into the room, shows you
being put aboard a spaceship, shows you being taken to another planet,
shows you being dumped in the sea, and shows you start from the sea and
become seaweed and become this - and to work up stage by stage - giving
the millions of years which elapse on each step, see? And you go on and
on up the line, each step, each step, each step on an evolutionary
channel, and you run all the way through on these evolutionary channels.
A lot of this stuff starts looking awfully 3-D after you've been looking
at them for a while, and shows you eventually arriving at the state of
being a man. See? Gives you a bit more louse-up in the way of pictures
ending, pictures beginning, something of this sort.

And then they push you out through that exact corridor, past the
exact two dummies that are tied up, to the exact spaceship, put you in
the exact capsule, drop you into that exact sea, and expect you to make
some seaweed and go on up the beach. We were fooled only to the degree
of some of the incidents of What to Audit <History of Man> are actually
out of that. Some of the incidents of What to Audit are actual, some are
out of that Darwinian implant, see?

Now, that's very interesting, to recognize how they can make you
live your life twice. Because that one pretends to go into the future,
not into the past. Gorgeous louse-up, see? I know, I caught this with
myself, but after they dumped me down at the bottom of the sea, I said
"Ho-hum, skip it", and went over and picked up a young fisherman's baby,
and so forth, and hung around there for a while, catching my Breath.
Didn't bother to go through all this, seemed pointless.

But, the idea - that's very finite. That's a very short time ago.
That's only a couple of hundred million years ago. A lot of characters
around here got this, most of them become scientists. That actually is
the sole foundation of the Darwinian theory. That's the lot. Evolution:
there's no such thing.

Bodies don't evolve. They deteriorate, but they don't evolve. You
can trace all kinds of reasons how they evolve, and why they evolve, and
you can figure it all out, but the truth of the matter is when you get
horses on a planet, somebody came along and mocked up some horses! Now
they also mocked up these horses with the capability of growing hair or
not growing hair. You've got adjustment factors, but not evolution
factors. So you confuse the adjustment factors and prove the whole
theory of evolution. And now you know man came from mud, and you can
write a book like Pavlov and get the whole world poisoned. You see how
this one goes?

All of this is based on what? It's based on errors in time. Errors
in time. Because an individual has this incident: It's a wrong time,
wrong place, going wrong wrong the whole way, and it took up two hours
and actually looks like it takes up seven million, see? There are such
incidents.

Just before the Helatrobus Implants they were practicing these. Just
before the Helatrobus Implants, you're liable to pick one up on a pc,
within the few hundred billion years earlier than the Helatrobus
Implants, or perhaps even after the Helatrobus Implants, you're liable
to pick up one of these false-track incidents. So they last - they're
liabIe to be found almost any place.

Now, if you know that these things exist you can whip it. See, it's
all in what you - what you know exists.

When you first collide with one, you're going to be "Gee-whiz!" you
know, and you're going to be much more nervous than you need to be. If
you know there is such a thing as a false-past incident and you check up
for these things, at the risk of invalidating the pc's actual track, you
get yourself sailing along there, and you got this incident, and it's at
forty-four trillion years ago, perfectly valid date, you see?

The reason I'm talking to you so strenuously about this is you're
just about to be correcting somebody's dates. As a matter of fact you
were at it today. You start correcting the dates of incidents and you're
going to run into this other Phenomenon. It's going to drive you mad,
man, if you don't know it exists. You can't correct dates on a case
unless you know this other phenomena exists, because it's full of false
dates, see?

Pc and you could work at it, correcting false dates - I don't know,
another couple of hundred hours, all out of one two-and-a-half-hour
incidents. The thing to do is to, when you start correcting dates of
incidents the first thing you should look for is an incident that
contains a false past. Not an incident contains flse dates. Don't worry
about false dates so much. You just want false past.

But, remember that it can also contain a false future. So that
mustn't be totally dismissed as a possibility. Fortunetellers practice
that to this day; it's very popular, false futures. They get you sitting
over the crystal ball, you know, and they say, "I see a dark man coming
into your life. And he'll be six feet tall if you give me two bucks, and
he'll only be five foot eight, if you don't give me..." They're tailor
making future. And most fortunes depend on the fact that pcs have future
implants that they dramatize, and tend to dramatize. They want to always
know about the future. They're really not nervous, they're just
dramatizing an implant.

You must ask for false past. That'll give you the most loused-up,
because future doesn't, too often, contain dates. But also check for
false futures - an incident about false futures. And between the two of
these things, why, you're all set. False present, well, everybody knows
it's false anyway.

The task is not a very difficult one, providing you know this
information. As far as GPMs are concerned, you go back on the track on
GPMs, and you got GPMs at eighteen trillion, trillion years ago, and ha-
ha, they start banging you in the head and firing left and right, and
you're going over the rolly coaster, and you're doing this and you're
doing that. Yes, there's always the possibility there could be an
implant that also refers to this GPM, but that cannot be done.

What type of equipment is used now, in order to implant false dates,
and so on? It's usually quite - it's quite varied, but it really never
moves off the basis of something you look into or something you look at,
attended by electronic blasts. And that's the common denominator of all
such equipment.

In other words, you can have a room, and the person is put on a bed,
and the screen and so on, is at a diagonal up in front of them or at the
other end of the room, and it shows a three-dimensional view of events
or something like that. Meantime the person is being hit with this and
that. It could be as simple as some kind of a scope that has a movie
running in the back of it, you put your face or your face is put up to
this scope and anchored there with some electric blasts, and at this
close range, why, the thing runs off at a mad rate, and there it goes,
with appropriate jolts in the right places.

It could also be, it could also be a full set which is lugubriously
- and this is earlier track when they didn't mind mass so much. If you
find any back there they probably have full sets connected with them.
They move them like a stage set. One of the trick ways of building these
things, you take these two crayons here, you notice that it - that they
are not a consecutive line if I hold them like this. And if you pull
them down like this, they look like they're a consecutive line, don't
you see? But there's a hole between the two of them. So the set moves up
and then goes this way around the person. You understand? If a person is
anchored there on a stake, or something like this, you see, when they -
when the set moves then, why, they just jog the set. And he passes
through this slit, which he can't see.

Looks very mysterious to him. He's in one environment, total 3-D
environment, he's in the next environment, total 3-D environment. After
his sonic and visio picks up a little bit, however, he can hear the
scene shift. They really make a lot of noise. And that type of thing, by
the way, is used in some very early implant serieses types of pictures
of this kind.

The Helatrobus, the Bear and Gorilla and Glade Implants, none of
them use pictures. They sometimes - there's only - the only picture I
know of used in the Helatrobus Implants is on a railroad on which you
travel sideways at a vast rate of speed. And when you meet the railroad,
when you come down to the railroad, you'll see that there's a section
house right at the point where you're put on the track. There's a house
there, see? And then as you move down the track, a board goes up in
front of you, and it's the same section house. So actually you're moved
at sixiy miles an hour sideways with the same section house sitting in
front of you. And this is supposed to confuse you enormously. But almost
any thetan, no matter how anaten he is, can see that it's just a board
shoved up in front of him.

In the Gorilla and Bear GPMs, and so on, they do put a figure on the
cart with the thetan. They've - there's a guy in a pink shirt with a
monkey peeking out from behind him, put on the ride carts. A guy in a
pink-striped shirt - very, very interesting. That's their - that was
their badge, the hoi poiloi. And you'll see this bird with a pink-
striped shirt. Sometimes you have a gorilla in front of you. Sometimes
it's the gorilla who is spitting things at you, and that sort of thing.

They use figures. But this is not the same thing I'm talking about.
Don't think you're mixed up in one of these things just because in an
implant, why, somebody jumps up with a picture, see, or something like
that that's just a momentary picture. This is not the same intention.
That's just to get you to make pictures, or louse up your pictures, or
something like that. No, we're talking about another type of incident,
another type of incident entirely, where you're hit with electronic
blasts, at the same time you're hit with a series of pictures, which
purport to be a past or a future for the individual.

And when you run into that one, when you run into that one, why, if
you don't recognize that these things can exist, why, you've had it.
Now, this also gets in the road of running an actual incident. You've
got an actua planet-builder incident, and it looks pretty wild to you.
And it doesn't look like the pc could possibly have done it, and so
forth. And you date it, and it's got a perfectly right date, and so on.
And you've got no read of any kind on false pasts or anything of this
character, and yet there's that picture and it seems very incredible to
you that the pc could be running this at that particular level or line,
and that sort of thing. You can get tangled up on this, but just don't
forget to run the incident. Get tangled up all you please, but run the
incident. If it's a right incident, it's a right incident. If it's a
wrong incident, you'll never be able to find the beginning of it.

About the most maddening activity you can get into is get into one
of these false-past things, and go whirring along at a mad rate trying
to find the beginning of the incident. Of course, you never make it. You
eventually will find a beginning of an incident, but it'll be an
incident of such fantastic magnitude that you've got yourself - Aw! The
hell with it! You know? It could take you four, five, six sessions, just
to try to find the beginning of that sequence of events. Well, there's
no sense in beating your brains out. If you can't find easily the
beginning of an incident, you better get interested in whether or not
this thing has got a false past or a false future in it.

That all depends of course on having your date right. Now, how do
you clean up somebody, how do you clean up somebody with something like
this? Your approved technology at the present moment is clean up his
wrong dates.

I'm giving you this material because right now some of you are
engaged in running a Prepcheck on wrong dates. And it's a very good
thing you are. You're getting tremendous tone arm action, you're getting
results on this sort of thing, and this is all a very happy thing.
Remember this: When you start correcting dates, the first thing you're
going to run into is any false-past or false-future incident that you
have triggered on the pc. And you're going to run into it head-on. So
you beware of redating. Don't redate incidents endlessly.

The first order of business is get in there and pitch on the subject
of an incident containing a false past. And when you've got that found,
because it'll be there, when you've got that found, and when you've got
it run... Don't just find it and date it and walk off, because look,
you're not going to date anything else from there on except the track,
that is in it! You can date endlessly. You could run a pc maybe
thousands of hours, cleaning up this false track which didn't exist.
They can see it and so forth.

So, look, if you got your hands on an incident, now, here's one of
your rules of the game, when you've got your hands on an incident - even
though it's hell to run and upsets the pc, and everything else, and so
on - when you've got your hands on an incident which contains a false
past or a false future, you finish that incident. You understand? Finish
it from one end to the other. Do anything necessary to get it the hell
off the track.

The best way to handle it, of course, is with R3R. You just do
standard R3R on the thing. And remember that its pretended duration will
be in the millions or billions or trillions or quadrillions. And its
actual duration is probably in the matter of hours - at the most a day
or two.

So I have to give you all this data now, and it's a good thing that
it's turned up, because you just start correcting dates on a pc and
about the first thing you're going to trip into is the phenomena of
false past with all its attendant false dates. And the moment you get
collided with one of those things you've had it. You want to do a pc an
awful lot of good, however, get rid of one of them. Don't mistake me,
they're hell to get rid of. You take the pc to the beginning of the
incident, and he goes to the beginning of the incident. Only the
beginning of the incident is also inside the incident, as well as at the
beginning of the incident. You get the idea?

He finishes up - he finishes up the incident, he leaves the incident
at the point where it says he left the incident, but that's a picture of
his leaving the incident, and you haven't run out his leaving the
incident, you got the idea? These things usually have a minimum of two
beginnings, identical, and two ends, identical. If you know that, why,
you can sometimes pull the fat out of the fire. This thing - you don't
do anything with it, unless it starts running badly. If it runs badly,
why re-duration the actual incident itself, and square it around, and
just do a routine, workmanlike auditing job. It doesn't need anything
extraordinary about this thing. The pc will eventually plow on through
it. All you need is very standard auditing. Very standard R3R, just its
usual steps.

You get into a fight with the pc about the thing, however, it's
always perfectly kosher to tip him off and say, "Well, are there two
beginnings?" Ask on the meter, "Are there two beginnings to this
incident?" Pang! Pang! Well, you know you got a false past incident,
see? "There are two endings? The reason you're having trouble with
reaching the end of the incident, are there two endings to this
incident?" Pang! Pang! "Yeah, you got your two endings on the end of the
incident."

Pc says, "Huh! There are!" As well as another beginning and ending
of the incident that merely says it begins and ends at this point, which
is inside the point when it really begins and ends. Talk about
confusion.

These things are confusing to handle. But standard processing, right
as of this minute, handles them. And you're going to run into them head-
on, the instant that you start correcting anybody's dates. It's one of
the first things that'll raise its hand, and elect to fall in your lap
as an auditor, is one of these incidents.

Well, what if you're - what if you're in X Unit, and you've been
ordered to do a Prepcheck on wrong dates on the pc, and so forth, and
the pc starts sliding all over the track, and you're not supposed to do
anything but correct that? Let me tell you the wrong thing to do. Let me
tell you the wrong thing to do: Get your hands on one of these false-
past or false-future incidents that's full of dates, get it dated
precisely and then walk off and leave it and try to do something else.
You're not going to get anything else done. I can tell you that's wrong.
I won't tell you what else to do, because I'll probably contradict the
orders your Instructors will be giving you. But I can tell you what not
to do. Don't walk off and leave it.

Because you have run into, restimulated and excited thousands of
dates. Hundreds or thousands of dates have been excited, just like that.
And if somebody didn't have that pc's auditor's report, and that pc
ceased to be audited in some way, somebody would be wading through that
for a long time trying to find the actual incident again.

One of the rules of auditing, one of the little rules that goes
along with: don't talk to people who are unconscious, you know - around
people who are unconscious, and don't - and all aberration is at the
bottom of the aberration a lie; a lie causes aberration - along with
that is the fact that when you got your paws on something, you handle
it. That's a maxim that I go by in my own auditing. When I find that
lying under the needle of my E-Meter is something that's bothering the
living daylights out of the pc, not because he put it there, but because
it arrived there in the course of auditing, I handle it.

I don't expect the pc to go on struggling with this thing as a PTP
while I do something else because "I'm supposed to." When I get my hands
on something in a case, I handle it. You understand? It makes for a
little - much less trouble with a case. You get your hands on something,
your - this thing is going crash! on wrong dates, crash! on wrong dates.
Well, rrrr What the hell! You got the pc right there on wrong dates;
what are you going to do now? Are you going to skip that? You see? Walk
off and leave it? Well, you know it's top-level stuff. How come wrong
dates? What are these wrong dates all about? Let's deal up a few of
these wrong dates. Let's find out what this wrong date thing is. You're
unfortunately liable to find yourself in a process you're not permitted
to run.

Just remember this. If you louse up your pc - well, I always make
sure that you get two thousand words! <Ed. note: in this time period,
students had to write an essay after goofing a session> And remember
this: I never ask how it was done. That's good enough, see? Somebody
loused up a pc, why, bang. I'm very interested at that point. He loused
up the pc. I'm not interested if he loused up the pc because the
Instructor said, or because he did, or because the bulletin said, or the
this said or the that said, or something else said; I'm just interested
in that he loused up the pc, see? I have a very short-circuited view of
the whole thing.

Because auditing is auditing. You're supposed to do auditing. I can
lay you down thousands of rules on the subject of auditing. I can guide
your footsteps very directly. I can give you information on the subject
of auditing. I can do everything else. But I can't sit in that chair and
audit your pc. You understand?

And auditing, from my point of view, is supposed to produce
beneficial results on a pc. That's my narrow-minded attitude. You
understand? So that here's the - here's the pc - here's the pc, and
we're supposed to produce good results on the pc. Well, if you don't
know how to do this or how to do that or something else, I can show you
how to do this or how to do that. Well, you can't ever tell what is
going to come up in this case. When it's going to come up. You're not -
you can't tell.

Now, when you're auditing a pc, when you're auditing a pc, very
often a pc comes into session in no fit shape to go on with what you're
running on the pc. It's very heroic of you to try to keep on running
what he's on, but remember that you can sometimes not accomplish
anything by doing just this. You sometimes have to handle the pc, right
there in front of you.

Now, similarly, you innocently set forward to do a fundamental
action on a case, like straighten out his dates. And you suddenly see
yourself staring down the barrel of the incident responsible for the
wrong dates.

Now, remember, there's your big auditing cycle. Your big auditing
cycle is to accomplish what you're trying to accomplish with the case.
And you better figure out what you're trying to accomplish with the case
that you're auditing. In this case you're trying to straighten out the
pc's dates, right? All right, that's your big auditing cycle, right? All
right. So, you're trying to straighten out the pc's dates. Now, if you
go ahead and handle his lumbosis, God help you, see. I mean that has
nothing to do with it. You're trying to straighten out his dates. That's
a Q and A or a mess-up, see?

You're trying to straighten out the big auditing cycle on this pc -
we're going to get the wrong dates off this case - and suddenly you are
presented with something which is outside the perimeter of the permitted
process, or something like that. What do you do with it? I can tell you
what NOT to do with it. Neglect it. Now that's what you must not do with
it. Because you very often can't get your paws on it again. You've made
a big problem for somebody else.

You can't straight - when you - listen: When you've found the source
of the pc's upset, what other source is there to find? See? You got
that? So if you're supposed to be running, "Which ruddy rod have you
stuck between your ears?" and you all of a sudden find yourself staring
at the source of his upset about ruddy rods, I can tell you how not to
help the pc: Ignore the fact that you have found the source of it. This
results in an invalidation of the source, and nothing happens. You
understand?

You have to ask yourself, why are you running this thing about rudy
rods between the ears? That's the big auditing cycle. Don't ever
subordinate your big auditing cycle to the minor auditing cycle. You
understand? See, there's your big auditing cycle, and then there's your
process auditing cycle - you're supposed to flatten this process, see?
But your big one is what you're trying to - intend with the pc. And then
you're - what process you're running on the pc, and then you've got your
other auditing cycle, which is your repetitive give and take of auditing
commands, don't you see?

All right, the second that you - some auditors can just get on this
give and take of auditing commands and neglect even the process they're
trying to flatten, see? And some, running the process they're supposed
to flatten, actually can run into the denouement of the big auditing
cycle. That's the end, see? The big auditing cycle - they've collided
with the thing.

This person has been terrified of ghosts. This person has been
terrified of this particular subject. Every time they go to bed at
night, why, they won't turn out the lights. You see? They've been this
way since childhood, or something of this character. And all of a
sudden, you're running this process of somekind or another, you're
straightening out something, and the big auditing cycle turns up and
drops into your paws. See? They say, "No! Not really! I'm a ghost! Ha-
ha! Me! Ha-ha-ha! What do you know! I've always been afraid of myself."
Now, what are you going to do from this on? What, are you going to be a
complete knucklehead? Going to be a complete jackass? Having found the
source, now you're going to try to do what? I'm just bringing it to your
attention, what else is there left to do? There isn't anything else left
to do.

Somebody cognites his chain level - his level item assessment out.
"Say! What do you know! It's a so-and-so and it's a th-lul, and it's a
du-du-ddl, and fa-dt-d-d-dt! And, ha, well, ha-ha! What do you know!
That's in the bag! That's why that level operated!"

<Ed note: At this time, R3R was started by assessing for a level on
the pre-have scale and then handling the level by errasing engram
chains>

And you say the level. You say the level, "be leery of cats." Tone
arm is down. Now, what are you going to do? Flatten the chain? You have
to ask yourself this question. What chain? What chain are you going to
flatten? Where? It now isn't! That is known as your big auditing cycle.
That's what you're intending to do with the person.

If you don't know that, I can see you someday auditing a person up
to OT, and they arrive at the point of OT. And you get very upset,
because you haven't completed your auditing cycle! You understand? So
that's present in all auditing. Having found the source of the
aberration in wrong dates, what you going to do? Look for another
source?

What you haven't got in your mind, then, is the big auditing cycle:
What were you intending to do with the pc? What does this process intend
to do with this pc? Wrong dates? Well, it's supposed to straighten out
the pc's wrong dates, what else? And all of a sudden - you didn't even
ask for it, and you possibly in a lot of cases won't get it right away,
unless you're running R3R work - all of a sudden you've got your paws on
the source of the pc's wrong dates! What you going to do? Run the
process, of course. What nonsense.

You're going to go on and say, "Give me another source for wrong
dates. Give me another source for wrong dates. Give me another ... "
He's just given you the source for a wrong date, see? What - the second
that you say, "Give me another source for wrong dates", what are you
looking at? You're looking at invalidation of THE source for wrong dates
and from that point on you have thereafter defeated your auditing. See
that? So there's where it'd go. So all of a sudden this guy suddenly
says, "Hey! Hey, hey, hey! There's a bup-ut-ut-it and a zu-zuz-up and
all that track I thought I - uh - mmmulp!" You speak about wrong dates,
well there it is, see? What are you going to do?

Now, you make your peace with the Instructors, but remember I count
on you to handle the pc.

Thank you very much!

Web auditing at any place of the planet http://webauditing.org/english.html
Timecops
 
Сообщений: 1881
Зарегистрирован: 25 июн 2011, 15:42

Вернуться в L Ron Hubbard original LECTIONS, TAPES

Кто сейчас на форуме

Сейчас этот форум просматривают: нет зарегистрированных пользователей и гости: 2

cron